Action / Horror / Thriller

Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Certified Fresh 89%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 55%
IMDb Rating 5.4 10 7895


Uploaded By: FREEMAN
Downloaded 63,889 times
April 25, 2016 at 10:29 AM



Sarah Bolger as Emelie
Joshua Rush as Jacob
720p 1080p
601.23 MB
23.976 fps
1hr 20 min
P/S 1 / 13
1.24 GB
23.976 fps
1hr 20 min
P/S 1 / 17

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by Adam_West_as_Batdan 5 / 10

Shows initial promise, but does not deliver the goods

The movie started out promising enough but once the (dodgy) motive was revealed half-way through, the logical loopholes in the plot and weaknesses overall of the script started to show and it just became rather... meh.

And there was very little pay off in the end, it was supposed to be a thrilling ending but it just didn't work at all.

I don't know what more to say really, it's not a whole lot you can say about it as it is such a simple movie and it's impossible to talk about the plot without spoiling it.

But the acting was alright (Sarah Bolger will probably go on to do bigger and better things) and the cinematography was stellar, but yeah overall it just wasn't a great movie.

Reviewed by Rob Lamm 10 / 10

My Review of Emelie

I watched this film with my brother and we definitely both had a good time at the movies. We were both very impressed with Michael Thelin's direction. Many horror films go for cheap scares, but Emelie never gives into easy tropes or genre clichés. There was one particular scene in the middle of the movie that I will never forget, involving a pet snake;). I thought this scene was shot brilliantly; particularly in that it didn't show us too much. In the end, Emelie delivers a powerful; albeit chilling message about the people we let into our homes. If I ever have to hire a babysitter, I will definitely remember this film!

Reviewed by ericrnolan 9 / 10

"Emilie" (2015) is a superb, gut-wrenching thriller.

I'll come straight to the point — "Emilie" is an exceptional horror- thriller that belongs on your list of films to see, provided you can stomach some disturbing content. This movie hooked me in under a minute, even before its title appeared on screen. Then it kept me glued to it throughout most of its running length. It could have been an even better film — a classic on par with "Psycho" (1960) or "Fatal Attraction"(1987), were it not for some key creative choices about halfway through.

I'd give this movie a 9 out of 10. It succeeds for two reasons — great acting and a script that perfectly employs dialogue that is first subtle and nuanced, and then increasingly frightening. The title character is a babysitter who is not what the parents expected, in more ways than one. After some deliberately awkward character interaction with the departing parents, she proceeds to subject the children to a series of progressively more demented psychological games. What follows is a thriller brimming with pathos. The movie reminded me a lot of the critically acclaimed and controversial "Funny Games" (2007). That film also showed ostensibly innocent adversaries entering a family's home after gaining their trust, and then doing awful things.

Emilie is played to perfection by Sarah Bolger, who has a beautiful, kind face, which only makes the character's incongruous psychopathy even more unsettling for the viewer. It took me a while to place the actress' face, until I recognized her as the somewhat feckless protagonist of 2011's "The Moth Diaries." I was impressed with her talent then as a hapless good guy, and I think her performance here was phenomenal. She plays the innocent-looking, yet icy antagonist here with subtle, unnerving malice. The rest of the cast is also uniformly quite good. This is true even of the young child actors, but most especially of Joshua Rush.

The movie is briskly paced, but its sparing dialogue still manages to rattle and then shock. It's a sometimes obscene story of imperiled children that really gets under your skin. Most of its directing is clean and clear. Combined with the unusual score, it gives the story a dreamlike quality.

The movie loses its way just a little at about the 40-minute mark, when its perverse, moody dialogue and strictly psychological horror give way to the familiar elements of a boilerplate thriller. An unnecessary backstory is given for our antagonist, delivered by an overly convenient, standard flashback sequence that feels out of place and that disrupts the pacing. ("Her mind was shattered.") Then, other plot points also feel just a little by-the-numbers, moving "Emilie" away from true cinematic greatness and toward just being a very good horror flick.

Finally, Bolger's villain is defanged a little when the script calls for her to lose her calm demeanor after the plucky, oldest child (Rush) defies her, in a well executed but entirely predictable David and Goliath story. And her character's reliance on a nameless, voiceless and superfluous confederate here also makes her a little less enigmatic.

How much greater would this movie have been if Emilie's motivations remained a mystery? What if, like "Funny Games" or "The Strangers" (2008), all we knew is that she was an highly intelligent sociopath acting for no discernible reason? What if she were acting entirely alone?

And what if the horror remained strictly psychological, with no actual violence to up the ante until the closing minutes? The most disturbing scenario I can think of is this — what if she were able to psychologically manipulate the children to violently turn against one another, or against their parents upon their return? That could be an ambiguous, darker and far more thematic story than the second half of the film we see here.

Still, this was a damned effective scary movie, and that's good enough. I recommend it.

One more thing — there actually is a famous, heartwarming French romantic comedy entitled "Amelie" (2001). I think it would be blackly funny if some sentimental filmgoers wanted to rent that and accidentally picked up "Emilie."

Read more IMDb reviews


Be the first to leave a comment