Jack Reacher: Never Go Back

2016

Action / Adventure / Crime / Mystery / Thriller

322
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Rotten 37%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 46%
IMDb Rating 6.1 10 81120

Synopsis


Uploaded By: FREEMAN
Downloaded 1,937,786 times
January 19, 2017 at 05:29 AM

Director

Cast

Tom Cruise as Jack Reacher
Cobie Smulders as Turner
Robert Knepper as Gen. Harkness
Danika Yarosh as Samantha
720p 1080p
873.29 MB
1280*720
English
PG-13
23.976 fps
1hr 58 min
P/S 58 / 682
1.8 GB
1920*1080
English
PG-13
23.976 fps
1hr 58 min
P/S 85 / 749

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by Toastr11 1 / 10

Never Go Back is more like 'Never Go in the First Place'

It's just so so so bad. Cliché, No action and dreadful production.

I had heard about how bad this movie was from a friend, but since me and some other guys were stranded in a shopping mall with nothing to do for 3 hours, I decided to just let go and enjoy an action blockbuster for once. I was so wrong. It's an atrocious piece of filmmaking, which has literally EVERY cliché in it, from the stroppy teenager to the Afghanistan reference to 'These people were under my command!!!!!!!' to the person in the control room shouting 'I want eyes on every asset they've got / I want to know everywhere he's slept in the last four years, I want to know how he takes his eggs, what his favourite flavour of ice cream is...'. This is why we need to stop Tom Cruise from producing his own movies, because he can't carry a whole movie on his own. The directing is atrocious and the script is disgusting. Tom Cruise is okay, but everyone else might as well have been picked straight from the street. There is literally NO ACTION UNTIL THE LAST SCENE. Anyone who says this movie is 'Action Packed' is lying. Just don't watch it: these people don't deserve any more money after putting such sh*t in my face.

Reviewed by s3276169 5 / 10

Huge disappointment

Jack Reacher: Never Go Back ought to be bi-lined "Never Go Forward".

This flick is firmly mired in 90's action "corniness". This seems to be a "old" "new" trend. Revisiting past formula's that worked once upon a time, with the hope they will work again, in the 21st century.

Fact is, viewers have, for the most part, become more sophisticated. For me, the new Jack Reacher is an anachronism. Its watchable but its comes across as dated, "silly" and utterly implausible, even by Hollywood stands.

Jack floats around like an avenging wraith, solving crimes for the military, whilst breezily moving in and out of military facilities, as if he has been given a lifetime pass to a weird, uptight, country club. Worse still, the antagonists come across as bumbling and inexplicably foolish. His success is never in doubt.

The result is a film that's "light weight" entertainment at best. Its not bad, as such, its just rather nondescript and not overly engaging. Five out of ten from me.

Reviewed by D H 3 / 10

This is a Jean Claude Van Dame level movie B-

This is worse than part 1. Part was wasn't too bad, but this is plain awful. It is wrong on many levels - the plot is incredibly weak, the acting is awful, and the script is straight out of a 70s B movie.

In an alternate universe this movie star Jean Claude Van Dame. However in this universe Tom Cruise appears to have failed miserably, as did direction, script writing etc.

Corny lines like, "They ran out of Medal" when referring to how heavily awarded this former MP is, happen to be just one example amongst the many.

Then there is the plot, the pointless proactive attempt by the bad guys to lock up and kill Major Smulders, follow Jack Reacher, create a professional baddie that takes things personally.

This may well be the tipping point decline in the career of Tom Cruz, he just looked past it, slow, completely unbelievable.

I won't say much more, this movie isn't worth wasting the time on the critique.

Read more IMDb reviews

165 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment