Peter Pan

2003

Action / Adventure / Family / Fantasy / Romance

70
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Certified Fresh 77% · 144 reviews
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Upright 74% · 250K ratings
IMDb Rating 6.8/10 10 79741 79.7K

Please enable your VPN when downloading torrents

If you torrent without a VPN, your ISP can see that you're torrenting and may throttle your connection and get fined by legal action!

Get Surf VPN

Plot summary

In stifling Edwardian London, Wendy Darling mesmerizes her brothers every night with bedtime tales of swordplay, swashbuckling and the fearsome Captain Hook. But the children become the heroes of an even greater story, when Peter Pan flies into their nursery one night and leads them over moonlit rooftops through a galaxy of stars and to the lush jungles of Neverland.


Uploaded by: FREEMAN
January 17, 2016 at 01:27 AM

Director

Top cast

Jason Isaacs as Mr. Darling / Captain Hook
Olivia Williams as Mrs. Darling
Saffron Burrows as Story Narrator
720p.BLU 1080p.BLU
823.59 MB
1280*522
English 2.0
PG
23.976 fps
1 hr 53 min
Seeds 16
1.71 GB
1920*784
English 2.0
PG
23.976 fps
1 hr 53 min
Seeds 32

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by wes-connors 8 / 10

Peter Breaks Through

Nothing against the memorable versions featuring Betty Bronson, Bobby Driscoll, and Mary Martin - portraying James M. Barrie's boy wonder - but, this adaptation of "Peter Pan" comes closer to the spirit of the original work. For one thing, "Peter" is played by a real boy, which enables Jeremy Sumpter (as Peter) and Rachel Hurd-Wood (as Wendy) to more accurately portray Peter and Wendy as the pre-romantic couple. The novel's appealing mixture of "romance" and "adventure" is more in balance. The young characters, as children, mix "yin" and "yang". Both characters - Peter and Wendy - are important, and both possess the childlike masculine and feminine attributes.

Mr. Hogan's cast and crew present an outstanding production. Jason Isaacs' "Captain Hook" supports the engaging younger performers beautifully. And, Lynn Redgrave is a welcome addition to the lore. Although this is a relatively faithful-to-the-original adaptation, it only touches upon Mr. Barrie's powerful ending ("When Wendy Grew Up"). So, a more perfect Peter has yet to be filmed...

"Peter Pan" is about that magical part of being a child, before sexuality (or, puberty) takes over, and becomes the prime directive. It's a time when Pirates and Fairies may still be real - and the difficulty in letting that part of your life go may be recalled by adults viewing director P.J. Hogan's exciting interpretation. If you don't remember the magic, watch your children enjoy "Peter Pan" - then, you might remember…

It's second to the right, and then straight on 'till morning…

******** Peter Pan (2003) P.J. Hogan ~ Jeremy Sumpter, Rachel Hurd-Wood, Jason Isaacs

Reviewed by TheLittleSongbird 9 / 10

Near-perfect film, about the boy who never grew up!

This film is amazing. I also really like the Disney film, but I was really unimpressed by its sequel. Both this and the Disney film are superior to the sequel Return To Neverland, and I also recommend the animated TV series Peter Pan and the Pirates, with Captain Hook at his most complex.

I have only two flaws with this film. First, it isn't as complex and meaningful as the book by J.M.Barrie, which I think is one of the best children's books ever written. Secondly, likewise with Bobby Driscoll, the voice of Peter, in the Disney film, Jeremy Sumpter mayn't be to everyone's taste, as he doesn't quite live up to the playful and rather likable character in the book, but it is still a spirited performance.

However, this film has a huge amount to recommend it. First of all, is the gorgeous scenery and the cinematography. Such beautiful and vivid colours, that left you in wonder and wanting more. I also liked the fact, the producers made the film darker than the book to some extent, like making Hook more complex and more suave, an idea that they didn't quite explore in the Disney film. The acting was very good indeed. Rachel Hurd Wood is the picture of innocence as Wendy, and Richard Briers does more than a capable job as Smee. Plus Ludivine Sagnier was awesome, one of my favourite interpretations of Tinkerbell actually. Stealing the acting honours, like Dustin Hoffmann, like Hans Conried, like Tim Curry(in the animated series), is the wonderful Jason Isaacs, in a sometimes terrifying portrayal of Hook. And seriously he should have got an award for his brilliant performance. The music score was lovely too, very fantasy-like and sparkling.

In conclusion, a beautiful film, not as good as the book, but there is a lot to enjoy here. 9/10 Bethany Cox

Reviewed by MartinHafer 7 / 10

A lot closer to the book.....

I've gotta admit....I'm cheating a bit on the summary. I have never read J.M. Berrie's story "Peter Pan". But, my oldest daughter has and sat with me to watch this film and contributed a lot to the review--telling me how close and how different the story and film are. While this movie version is MUCH more adult than the cartoon, the book apparently is even more adult--such as having Peter apparently kill the Lost Boys when they get too old for Neverland! Yes, this IS NOT a story for little kids! In this version of Peter Pan, the story is quite a bit different from Disney's famous cartoon. Captain Hook kills quite a few people, Tinkerbell is even nastier and the film shows the depressed mom pining for her children after they've disappeared. The book, apparently, was darker. What is much different from the book, though, was the emphasis on romance between Wendy and Peter--as, in the book, Peter had little interest in this sort of thing and just wanted to play and live in the moment. I think they added this sexual tension (ewwww!) to try to make the story more cinematic. I think despite this, the film did strike a decent balance between the darkness of the story and how dark to make the film--but I would NOT recommend the film for younger viewers.

One final word about the film. Despite good acting, too often I was distracted from this because of all the crazy filters that were used on the print. I am not sure if this was added later using computers (I assume this is the case), but too often it really was hard on the eyes and distracting.

Verdict---worth seeing and MUCH better than "Hook". Still, despite being very different than the book, give me the Disney version.

Read more IMDb reviews

4 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment