The Beguiled

2017

Drama

55
Rotten Tomatoes Critics - Certified Fresh 78%
Rotten Tomatoes Audience - Spilled 52%
IMDb Rating 6.6 10 17333

Synopsis


Uploaded By: FREEMAN
Downloaded 132,613 times
October 01, 2017 at 07:47 AM

Director

Cast

Kirsten Dunst as Edwina
Nicole Kidman as Miss Martha
Elle Fanning as Alicia
Colin Farrell as Corporal McBurney
720p 1080p
680.93 MB
1280*720
English
R
23.976 fps
1hr 33 min
P/S 121 / 822
1.41 GB
1920*1080
English
R
23.976 fps
1hr 33 min
P/S 146 / 549

Movie Reviews

Reviewed by nepeta 5 / 10

The 1971 version was way much more interesting and thrilling

Yesterday I watched the remake of The beguiled and I found it much less impressive than the film made in 1971, but I couldn't remember so well the older version because I watched it more or less 20 years ago so I decided to watch it today to make a comparison. I find that the new version was completely spoiled by PC fanaticism. I don't understand why Sofia Coppola left out Hallie the slave, slavery was a key point on the American Civil war and Hallie was an important character with lots of interesting dialogues. She also left out the scenes of the crush between the soldier and Amy, the 12 years old girl in order to not shock people with paedophilia. The incestuous memories of Martha were also left out. In summary, she impoverished the characters, their relationships and their thoughts to avoid shocking PC people and replaced the interesting varied characters by a group of pretty blondes. The first version is much more thrilling and interesting. It's a shame that now with much better make up and photography the core of the film was spoiled.

Reviewed by houstons-82952 1 / 10

Have mercy!!

One of the worst movies i have ever seen. One hour later after the movie started, my wife smiled at me and said she was sorry for dragging me to that movie. I like watching these kind of movies with the company of my wife, but not this time. A few minutes before the end, i had the feeling that the film turned to thriller, but the end was so.... I mean, come on guys!!! Sofia (Coppola), what the hell!

Reviewed by syd9907 1 / 10

Runs a disappointing second to the 1971 version

*Spoiler Alert* Just in case you haven't seen this film or the original 1971 version.

The coach put me on the bench because I'm batting double OO with movies, the last string of films I viewed…All Eyez on Me, Transformers:The Last Knight and 40 Meters Down, were side-eye inducing without a doubt. But this weekend I saw the new Sofia Coppola film "The Beguiled", which is based on the 1971 film of the same name starring Clint Eastwood and Geraldine Page. Before I go all IN on the film, here's a little tidbit about Coppola. She just won the Best Director award at the Cannes Film Festival in May, and is only the 2nd woman in Cannes history to win in that category. Let that sink in for a minute. Now getting back to this film. Out of the gate, the pacing was extremely slow. So much so, that I actually started looking for which exit I could get to the quickest. But I'm a trooper, so I hung in there.

None of the characters were fleshed out, especially Kirsten Dunst and Nicole Kidman's caricatures of repressed southern belles. By the way, Kidman, Dunst, Elle Fanning and one other character in this meandering nonsensical film, kept losing their southern accents. I could have understood better if this were their first film (nervousness and all), but Kidman is an Oscar winner, Dunst and Fanning have over the years, gotten critical acclaim for their acting. They simply phoned in their performances and looked as if they couldn't have cared any less if they tried. Now let's get to Colin Farrell.

His once promising career really hit an all-time low with this schlock. He hardly had any dialogue and the dialogue he had, was comical and it wasn't supposed to be. THAT'S how bad this film is. His best scenes were off-screen after Kidman's character amputated his leg and he found out. Why Coppola chose for the audience to hear his tirade instead of seeing it, was puzzling to say the least. That probably would have been great to see because Farrell is a good actor and he does a lot of his best work when he's in meltdown on-screen. Coppola's choices with how she shot this film left me and I'm sure so many others who've already seen it, wondering WHY? But here's one choice she made I'm in full support of…the choice to NOT put the female slave character in this film that was in the book. The Black actress who would have been cast, dodged a bullet thank goodness. No one needs this incarnation of The Beguiled on their acting resume. The long and short of it is basically…The Beguiled didn't make any sense at all. It was a story without any substance or direction. How Coppola won in Cannes in the Best Director's category for THIS film is another mystery. To say The Beguiled wasn't her best work is an understatement, and it also begs to question the legitimacy of her winning that award.

Coppola has done tons of applause worthy work such as Marie Antoinette, The Virgin Suicides and Lost in Translation, did the judges in Cannes see the same film as the rest of us? Did they get their eyes dilated that day and couldn't really see the banality of this film….what happened? As one critic noted about the film "it was so unnecessary" and no truer words could EVER be said about this film. This was a good idea gone horribly wrong and Coppola, the writers who helped her create this puerile piece of tripe and the actors, had no clue how to make this film compelling enough to where it would hold your attention and the audience would become emotionally invested. Instead, it had the audience holding their breath counting the minutes until the agony was over.

Read more IMDb reviews

33 Comments

Be the first to leave a comment